Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
927-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

927-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.033420 50.876547)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.033307 50.876535,-1.033312 50.876557,-1.033328 50.876577,-1.033352 50.876593,-1.033384 50.876604,-1.033419 50.876607,-1.033454 50.876604,-1.033486 50.876594,-1.033512 50.876579,-1.033528 50.876559,-1.033534 50.876537,-1.033529 50.876514,-1.033513 50.876494,-1.033489 50.876478,-1.033457 50.876467,-1.033422 50.876464,-1.033387 50.876467,-1.033355 50.876477,-1.033329 50.876493,-1.033313 50.876512,-1.033307 50.876535)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL